Here is
a well-organized and sobering checklist that we can thank Rick Steves for. This
"checklist" of steps toward fascism is derived from his 40-minute 2026
speech in the YouTube video linked here: https://youtu.be/E20u5y7CJZQ
and at www.goese.com.
Rick’s
list is a genuinely useful framework for civic literacy.
1.
Exploit
fear and crisis.
Leaders rise during instability (economic collapse, war, social anxiety).
2.
Promise
simple solutions to complex problems.
They claim only they can “fix everything.”
3.
Position
themselves as a strong, charismatic savior.
A single leader becomes the embodiment of the nation.
4.
Encourage
blind loyalty (“the leader is always right”).
Critical thinking is discouraged.
5.
Create
enemies and scapegoats.
Minorities or outsiders are blamed for society’s problems.
6.
Stoke
anger and nationalism.
Emotions override rational debate.
7.
Use
propaganda to control perception.
Media is manipulated to glorify the regime.
8.
Undermine
or control the press.
Independent journalism is weakened or discredited.
9.
Erode
democratic institutions gradually.
Changes happen incrementally, not all at once.
10.
Normalize
small abuses of power.
“Small evils become big evils” over time.
11.
Encourage
conformity and suppress dissent.
Individuality is replaced by unity and obedience.
12.
Militarize
society and glorify force.
Violence and expansionism become acceptable tools.
13.
Use
legal means to gain power, then bypass the law.
Democracies are often dismantled from within.
14.
Reward
loyalty and punish opposition.
Critics are marginalized, intimidated, or eliminated.
15.
Convince
people democracy is weak or failing.
Citizens are persuaded to trade freedom for “order” or “security.”
The
checklist above closely tracks what historians of fascism—like Robert Paxton
and Umberto Eco—have documented. Rick Steves (an expert traveler, guide, and
historian) draws on his decades of traveling through Europe and visiting the
sites where fascism played out.
A few things stand out about the list as a whole…
The
sequencing is important. Points 1–6 are about seizing power emotionally and
psychologically. Points 7–10 are about consolidating it institutionally. Points
11–15 are about entrenching it permanently. It's a progression, not just a
checklist of unrelated traits.
Point 13
is especially chilling…the idea that democracies are often dismantled from the
inside, using legal mechanisms, rather than by outright military coups.
Mussolini, Hitler, and others all came to power through nominally legal
processes before gutting the institutions that brought them there.
Point 10
("small evils become big evils") reflects the "boiling
frog" dynamic that Steves emphasizes repeatedly...that the danger isn't
one dramatic moment but the slow normalization of things that would have been
unthinkable a few years earlier.
Point 15
is the ultimate goal: Once citizens are convinced democracy itself is the
problem, the autocrat no longer needs to fight it. People surrender it
voluntarily.
Now let’s
compare this to the Republican/GOP/MAGA playbook/agenda, known as “Project
2025.” Project 2025 is a real, well-documented policy blueprint, so we can
extract an accurate summary based on the actual document. It is presented here accurately
and fairly without political dramatization, drawing directly from the
documented contents of the 920-page Mandate for Leadership rather than critics
or proponents. Here is a distilled checklist of Project 2025's core proposals…
Project
2025 / Mandate for Leadership:
A Distilled
Checklist of the Core Proposals
A Note
on Framing:
Supporters
of Project 2025 would spin these same points very differently — as restoring
constitutional executive authority, eliminating unaccountable bureaucracy,
protecting traditional values, securing the border, and reducing government
overreach. People disagree sharply about whether those proposals are beneficial
or harmful, but the checklist above reflects what the document actually proposes. Unlike the Rick Steves fascism
checklist, this one describes an active policy agenda in the USA rather than a
historical pattern, so it sits squarely in ongoing political debate.
∎